Faith. Church. Theology. Culture. Let's Talk.

Saturday, February 2, 2008

The Trinity and You

Last semester I went on a trip with my World Religions class to visit a synagogue, an Islamic center, and a Zen Buddhism center. At the Islamic center we were able to sit down with the Imam (who is kind of like the pastor) and have a discussion. He was a smart guy who had a PhD and taught at (I think) R.I.T. When we sat down to talk with him I thought that he was just going to field some questions of ours, so I was surprised when he actually started to ask us questions.
"What are the three main monotheistic faiths?", He asked us.
We sat quietly. It was one of those questions that are really easy, but no one in the class will answer because it seems way too obvious. Eventually, we all scatteredly said "Christianity, Judaism, and Islam."
"That's correct," he said "now out of those three faiths which one is not purely monotheistic?"
We all knew the answer he wanted. "Christianity" I said, kind of bitterly.
"That's right," he replied "the Christian doctrine of the Trinity separates them from the pure monotheism of Judaism and Islam."
It was a humbling moment.
It is true, though. The idea of God as Trinity is one that is completely unique to Christianity. There are a few parts of the Koran that specifically denounce the idea of the Trinity, saying it soils the "oneness" of God. So what do we do with the Trinity? It is such a crazy complicated doctrine that it is easy to ignore. But the truth is that the doctrine of the Trinity has an effect on every other doctrine of the Christian faith. The Trinity is central to our faith. But one of the most important beliefs of our faith is also one of the most controversial. God in three persons. Father, Son, Holy Spirit. What does that mean?
The Trinity is very difficult. Trying to explain it is like walking a tight rope, if you lean too much in any direction you're going to be in trouble. Lean too much one way and you fall into Tri-Theism (three Gods). If you lean too much the other way you fall into modalism (sort of one unknown God wearing "masks" and assuming the roles of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit at different times in history). Every analogy for the Trinity falls short and can be subject to harsh criticism. So what do we do? Just leave it alone? Duh...no.
Like I said, the Trinity has an impact on the rest of Christian doctrine. Without it our Christology would be completely different, and from there on so would our doctrine of justification, sanctification, etc. etc. It would effect our worship. It would effect our very lives. But how?
The Trinity is important to our ideas about what it means to live in community. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit live in perfect union with one another without any subordination or anything like that. They have one purpose and God works perfectly within himself to carry it out. The Trinity is like a tree. The Father is the trunk, the Son is the branches, the Spirit is the leaves. Three parts, but one tree. This analogy falls short in a lot of ways, but its a start into the idea of God. The Trinity gives and sustains life. The Trinity gives love.
So should our communities. The purpose of a Christian community is to work towards one purpose, and that purpose is to spread as much love through the world as possible. It means spreading life and giving life. Like the three persons of the Trinity, we all in the community have different jobs to do. None of them are lower or higher or any more or less importance. Our relationships within the community should be completely loving and respectful. Living in a community means completely giving ourselves to one another. Our communities should reflect the Trinity. This is what it means to live in the light of God. How amazing would a Trinity centered community be? How effective and incredible and world changing would it be?
I know. How idealistic of me.

3 comments:

jesse said...

Jimmy,
Clear and well written. I feel the reference you made in your first post regarding your scatter-brained-ness (not a word, P.S) will give your posts the interesting flare that will not make your posts monotonous, rather fun to read. That is not to say, that there is anything monotonous about the Holy Spirit.

ugh, is there anything in scripture about blaspheming the Holy Spirit via blog posts? shoot.

well done, lad.

ParsonsTrippin said...

Hey Jimmy, interesting blog.

As I read through it I was wondering if although Judaism is monotheistic (the One True, Most High God), is the Old Testament, from which Judaism is derived from? (The unity you described I see as absolute. No question.) Does the OT describe a God who is simply one in nature (divine—e.g., Deut. 6:4-15; Isa. 43:9) and/or in person (personhoods—e.g., the use of the plural for God in Gen. 1:1; 26; 3:22; 11:7 and Isa. 6:8--the expressions of plural persons referred to in Num. 27:18; Psa. 2:7, 12; 51:10-12; 110:1; Prov. 30:4; Isa. 48:16; 61:1)? The NT speaks of the One God too, (Mk. 12:28-29; Jn 17:3; Rom. 3:30; Eph 4:6; and 1 Tim. 2:5).

I am not trying to instruct you in anything here, Jimmy. These are just some thoughts that I have had on the Trinity in the OT. Your blog got me to thinking about them again. It is also a lot easier to look back through the NT and see these things than to recognize them in OT days when Judaism was formed.

Thanks for your thoughts.

ParsonsTrippin

Jimmy said...

I guess the best answer I could give you is that to try and read the Trinity into the OT would be bad interpretation in a lot of cases (but not all cases). There are definitely some perplexing singular/plural uses for God in the OT that have even the most advanced scholars puzzled and active in dialogue. Like, for example, in Genesis 1:26 when God says "Let US make man in OUR image." Genesis and the OT is clearly monotheistic so this is a perplexing verse. One explanation for why God says "let US" is that it was proper to refer to God in a plural sense. Especially in a Creation narrative where the author was trying to emphasize the power and greatness of God. I don't think that that particular passage necessarily is a "foreshadowing" of the Trinity.

Of course, a Jewish interpretation of the OT is going to vary a lot in some very significant places. For example, we Christians read the Suffering Servant in Isaiah to be Jesus, while most Jews think that it refers to the nation of Israel. Neither Jews nor Muslims would want to separate God into three different persons, because they say it messes with the ONENESS of God. But to us, God IS one. But that one is also three. We believe that this is how the ONE God has chosen to reveal his true character: as Triune.

Sorry for the long answer :-) Thanks for the question! Sorry if I didn't respond well enough...